Seven Judges
Nine Judges
Thirty three Judges
Twenty five Judges
24
20
18
34
20
25
30
34
27 January, 1950
28 January, 1950
29 January, 1950
30 January, 1950
Supreme Court of India
Local Courts
Special Courts
High Court, U.P.
By an Act of Parliament in 1950
Under Indian Independence Act, 1947
Under Indian Government Act, 1953
By the Indian Constitution
The President of India
The Parliament
The Chief Justice of India
The Law Commission
The Chief Justice
The President
The Prime Minister
The Law Minister
By the will of the Chief Justice
By the President
By the President on the recommendation of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
By the President on the recommendation of the Parliament
As enquiry by C.B.I.
An enquiry by Chief Justice of India
A report by the Bar Council of India
An impeachment by the Parliament
62 years
63 years
64 years
65 years
Pay Commission appointed by the President
Law Commission
Parliament
Council of Ministers
Supreme Court only
High Courts only
Both Supreme Court and High Court
None of the Courts
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
Prime Minister
President
Law Minister
After recommendation by Rajya Sabha
On the advice of Lok Sabha
On the advice of Prime Minister
In consultation with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
Some Judges go on long leave
No one is available for permanent appointment
There is an abnormal increase in cases pending before the Court
There is no quorum of the Judges available to hold
Supreme Court
High Courts
District and Session Courts
All of the above
1993
1996
2000
2004
3
4
5
6
10
9
7
5
Advisory jurisdiction
Appellate jurisdiction
Original jurisdiction
Constitutional jurisdiction
Golaknath Case
Minerva Mills Case
Bank Nationalisation Case
T.M.A. Pai Foundation Case
Golaknath
A.K. Gopalan
Keshvanand Bharti
Menka Gandhi
Indira Sahni Case
Shankari Prasad's Case
Rudal Shah's Case
Keshavananda Bharti's Case
Five
Seven
Eleven
Thirteen
Indira Gandhi Vs. Raj Narain
Golaknath Vs. The State of Punjab
Bank Nationalization Case
Azhar Vs. Municipal Corporation
Article 131
Article 132
Article 132 read with Article 134A
Article 133 read with Article 134A
Original Jurisdiction
Appellate Jurisdiction
Advisory Jurisdiction
None of the above
138
140
142
146
Article 137
Article 130
Article 139
Article 138
The power of the Judiciary to pro- nounce upon the constitutionality of laws and executive orders
The power of the Judiciary to question the wisdom of the laws enacted by the Legislatures
The power of the Judiciary to review all the legislative enactments before they are assented to by the President
The power of the Judiciary to review its own judgments given earlier in similar or different cases
Has final authority over all issues
Can charge allegations against President
Can review the issues decided by High Courts
Can declare illegal any law of the State
Declare any law or order invalid if it is in conflict with the Constitution
Review the order of the Lower Courts
Hear appeals against the decision of the Lower Courts
Review the laws to see that they have been passed as per the procedure laid down
India only
U.K. only
U.S.A. only
Both in India and U.S.A.
Article 127
Article 122
Article 126
Article 139
Establishes three-tier federal set up in place of the existing two tier- set up
Removes Right of Equality before the law from Part III and places it elsewhere in the Constitution
Replaces Parliamentary System of Executive with the Presidential one
Establishes a Federal Court of Appeal to lighten the burden of the Supreme Court
Due Process of Law
Procedure established by Law
Rule of Law
Precedents and conventions
President
Attorney General of India
Speaker of Lok Sabha
Supreme Court
President
Parliament
Council of Ministers
Supreme Court
The President of India
The Prime Minister of India
The Lok Sabha Secretariat
The Supreme Court of India
Prime Minister
President
Any High Court
All of the above
Article 127 sub clause (1)
Article 143 sub clause (1)
Article 143 sub clause (11)
Article 144 sub clause (a)
The President of India
The Chief Justice of India
The Parliament
The Union Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs
President of India
Parliament by passing a resolution
Parliament by making a law
President in consultation with Chief Justice of India
Advise to the President on the issues of law or fact which are of public importance
Advise to the government of India on all Constitution matters
Advise to the Prime Minister on legal matters
Advise to all the above persons
On its initiative
Only if he seeks such advice
Only if the matter relates to the Fundamental Rights of citizens
Only if the issue poses a threat to the unity and integrity of the country
President
Any High Court
Prime Minister
All of the above
Article 142
Article 143
Article 144
Article 145
20
10
8
25
The Supreme Court rules, 1966
Article 145 of the Constitution of India
A Legislation made by Parliament
Article 348 of the Constitution of India
President
Supreme Court
High Court
None of the above
Article 355
Article 356
Article 256
Article 257
The Constitution
Judicial Interpretation
Opinion of the Jurists
Parliamentary Statute
The High Courts only
The Supreme Court only
The High Courts and the Supreme Court
The District Courts
It can change the Judgment
It can not change the Judgment
Only the Chief Justice of India can change the Judgment
Only the Ministry of Law can change the Judgment
With the approval of President
If the majority of Judges of Supreme Court so decide
With the approval of Parliament
On the request of State Legislature
Rail Board Bribery Case
Vineet Narayani Vs. Union of India
2G Spectrum Scam Case
Coal Gate Scam Case
TRAI, High Court, Supreme Court
TRAI and Supreme Court
High Court and Supreme Court
Supreme Court only
A Parliamentary Act
A Constitutional Amendment
Judicial initiative
None of the above
Public Interest Litigation
Public Inquiry Litigation
Public Investment Litigation
Private Investment Litigation
Only in Supreme Court of India
Only in High Courts of States
In Central Tribunals Administrative
Both in High Courts and Supreme Court
Australia
India
The United States
The United Kingdom
Committed Judiciary
Public Interest Petition
Judicial Review
Judicial Independence
What's Your Reaction?